<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sheila Kennedy &#187; rule of law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sheilakennedy.net/tag/rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sheilakennedy.net</link>
	<description>Thinking about Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Interesting Exchange</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/an-interesting-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/an-interesting-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=2729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many other civil libertarians, I have been deeply disappointed by President Obama&#8217;s willingness to continue many of the security practices of the Bush Administration. It is especially galling because&#8211;unlike Bush&#8211;Obama quite obviously knows what the Constitution requires, and has nevertheless been willing to engage in surveillance and other practices which most civil libertarians believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/an-interesting-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deconstructing &#8220;Special Rights&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/deconstructing-special-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/deconstructing-special-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" religious liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stand Your Ground]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=2680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I heard someone make the claim again yesterday: gays want &#8220;special rights.&#8221; So let me understand this argument:  If government respects the civil rights of Christians—and if Human Rights agencies protect those Christians from being picked on because of their beliefs—that’s simply government protecting equal rights. But if government treats LGBT folks just like it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2012/04/deconstructing-special-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong is Wrong</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy and Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indefinite detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the election of Barack Obama, the GOP&#8211;aka &#8220;the party of no&#8221;&#8211;has shown impressive discipline, putting party orthodoxy ahead of both the common good and, frequently, sanity. The Democrats, on the other hand, have happily confirmed Will Rogers&#8217; great line: &#8220;I&#8217;m not a member of any organized political party; I&#8217;m a Democrat.&#8221; The left wing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie White, the GOP, and the Rule of Law</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Republicans in the Statehouse passed House Bill 1242, changing the election law in order to avoid the consequences of having run an ineligible candidate, my husband shook his head. &#8220;It&#8217;s enough to make you ashamed of ever having been a Republican.&#8221; This from a man who worked for the GOP for over fifty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendering Judgment</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial temperment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the Bush administration, Americans are debating the meaning and importance of the rule of law. With Justice David Souter’s resignation, that discussion has intensified.   Most legal analysts give Souter high marks, and it is worth considering why. Souter was a brilliant and accomplished legal scholar, but there are many equally [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

