<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sheila Kennedy &#187; rule of law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sheilakennedy.net/tag/rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sheilakennedy.net</link>
	<description>Thinking about Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong is Wrong</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy and Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indefinite detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the election of Barack Obama, the GOP&#8211;aka &#8220;the party of no&#8221;&#8211;has shown impressive discipline, putting party orthodoxy ahead of both the common good and, frequently, sanity. The Democrats, on the other hand, have happily confirmed Will Rogers&#8217; great line: &#8220;I&#8217;m not a member of any organized political party; I&#8217;m a Democrat.&#8221; The left wing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/12/wrong-is-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie White, the GOP, and the Rule of Law</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Republicans in the Statehouse passed House Bill 1242, changing the election law in order to avoid the consequences of having run an ineligible candidate, my husband shook his head. &#8220;It&#8217;s enough to make you ashamed of ever having been a Republican.&#8221; This from a man who worked for the GOP for over fifty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2011/04/charlie-white-the-gop-and-the-rule-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendering Judgment</title>
		<link>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekenne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial temperment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheilakennedy.net/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the Bush administration, Americans are debating the meaning and importance of the rule of law. With Justice David Souter’s resignation, that discussion has intensified.   Most legal analysts give Souter high marks, and it is worth considering why. Souter was a brilliant and accomplished legal scholar, but there are many equally [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sheilakennedy.net/2009/05/rendering-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

