Pro-America?

Americans have engaged in a longstanding argument about the nature of patriotism–and how it differs from nationalism. I agree with those who argue that a true patriotism requires allegiance to the nation’s founding principles, and includes an obligation to protest official actions that violate those original commitments. Nationalism, on the other hand, requires belief in “my country right or wrong”–blind support for wherever the nation’s leaders take us.

It has become abundantly clear that the various members of the Trump administration fall into the second camp, which brings me to the nationalist idiocy of FCC Chair Brendan Carr.

As a Daily Beast headline accurately put it, “Trump Goon Demands ‘Pro-America’ Content from the Networks.” Among Carr’s suggestions: broadcasters should start each broadcast day with the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ or Pledge of Allegiance” and offer viewers daily “Today in American History” announcements that explain “significant events that took place on that day in history.” (Somehow, I doubt that those history lessons would include the My Lai massacre or Emmitt Till’s murder…) Carr wants “patriotic, pro-America content that celebrates the American journey and inspires its citizens.”

Evidently, truly “pro-American” material would exclude televised interviews with Democratic candidates, since the memo followed a widely-publicized episode in which Stephen Colbert was forbidden to air a segment with Texas Democrat James Talarico, who is running for the Senate. Colbert had been told by CBS lawyers that airing the interview would run afoul of Carr’s decision to enforce the FCC’s “equal time” rule for talk shows, which had traditionally been exempt from that rule. This was not a one-off; a couple of weeks before this incident, Carr had launched an investigation into The View after it broadcast an interview with Talarico.

Carr is evidently as stupid as the rest of Trump’s appointees: Colbert published the video on his YouTube channel, where it has garnered more than 8 million views to date–far more than most of his late-night interviews. (It also generated $2.5 million for Talarico’s campaign in a mere 24 hours.)

An article in The Independent also covered Carr’s request that broadcasters join his Pledge America Campaign–a promise to air “patriotic, pro-America content that celebrates the American journey and inspires its citizens by highlighting the historic accomplishments of this great nation from our founding through the Trump Administration today.”

Carr rather clearly doesn’t understand what it means to be a truly patriotic “pro American.” Anna Gomez–who is the only Democratic Commissioner at the FCC, took to X to school him, writing that “Nothing is more American than defending our constitutional rights against those who would erode our civil liberties. If broadcasters choose to participate in this FCC campaign, they can do so by defending their First Amendment rights and refusing government interference.”

Carr and his tone-deaf efforts to undermine the First Amendment are just one aspect of the Trump administration’s nationalism–a nationalism that is far from patriotic. Historians and political scientists define patriotism as affection, pride, and support for the shared values of one’s country, and a commitment to support national improvement. Nationalism, on the other hand, is a devotion to “blood and soil.” It emphasizes the superiority of the nation over others, and fosters exclusionary, competitive, and aggressive attitudes toward foreign nations.

There’s an excellent quote attributed to someone named Sydney Harris: “the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does.” Precisely.

After the close of the Olympics, the New York Times published an article titled “At the Olympics, I Saw the Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism.” It traced that distinction with references to the conduct of both athletes and audiences, and strongly rebutted J.D. Vance’s insistence that America’s “distinct national culture is part of what makes international institutions suspect, immigration threatening and alliances based on shared principles unwise.” The essay concluded:

With our wallets, our attention, our time and our collective groans with every fall and cheers for every newly realized lifelong dream, the world’s citizens are sending a message: We proudly root for our countries, but we are more than just our countries. And in many cases we are better — much better — than the governments in charge of them.

To be “pro America” is to be patriotic–not nationalistic. Too bad Trump and Carr don’t understand the difference.