Skip to content
Sheila Kennedy

Sheila Kennedy

A jaundiced look at the world we live in.

  • Blog
  • Books
  • About
  • Contact

Tag Archives: civic engagement

The Culture Warriors Are Coming For Your Schools

May 19, 2023

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

For at least the past decade, pundits reporting on the steady degradation of American political life have argued that America’s far-too-apathetic polity wouldn’t act  “until we hit bottom.”

I think we’re there.

Posts and comments to this blog regularly grapple with the widespread lack of civility–not to mention intelligence–in public life. There’s the in-your-face bigotry, the denial of science and evidence, defense of the ever-widening gap between the rich and the rest, and the daily assaults on democracy and democratic norms.

Those very unAmerican behaviors and beliefs have recently been joined by an all-out MAGA attack on public education. GOP legislatures have diverted education funding to fundamentalist religious schools, Republican administrations are banning books, and extremists have taken over an uncomfortable number of school boards.

I recently came across an NBC report detailing one such takeover, in Colorado.

Woodland Park, a small mountain town that overlooks Pikes Peak, became the first — and, so far, only — district in the country to adopt the American Birthright social studies standard, created by a right-wing advocacy group that warns of the “steady whittling away of American liberty.” The new board hired a superintendent who was previously recalled from a nearby school board after pushing for a curriculum that would “promote positive aspects of the United States.” The board approved the community’s first charter school without public notice and gave the charter a third of the middle school building.

Among other moves that especially alarmed teachers was the decision by the new superintendent not to reapply for the grants that covered the salaries of counselors and social workers. When challenged, he told staff members that he “prioritized academic achievement, not students’ emotions. We are not the department of health and human services.” When asked if taxpayers would get a say in these changes, he said that they already had — when they elected the school board.

Woodland Park offers a preview of how quickly a new majority can move to reshape a district — and how those battles can ripple outward into the community. Some longtime residents say that the situation has grown so tense, they now look over their shoulder when discussing the school board in public to avoid confrontation or professional consequences…

When asked to respond to criticism from school personnel and parents, Illingworth, the board’s vice president, replied in an email: “I wasn’t elected to please the teacher’s union and their psycho agenda against academic rigor, family values, and even capitalism itself. I was elected to bring a parent’s voice and a little common sense to the school district, and voters in Woodland Park can see I’ve kept my promises.”

As the school year winds down, many of the Woodland Park School District’s employees are heading for the exit, despite recently receiving an 8% raise. At least four of the district’s top administrators have quit because of the board’s policy changes, according to interviews and emails obtained through records requests. Nearly 40% of the high school’s professional staff have said they will not return next school year, according to an administrator in the district.

While Colorado is rapidly becoming a Blue state, Woodland Park is a mostly white, middle-class city of 8,000 people up a mountain pass from Colorado Springs. The community voted for Donald Trump over Joe Biden by 2-to-1 a year earlier.

When teachers complained about Board decisions, the Board’s vice-president accused the teachers’ union of attempting to organize a “coup,” and issued a barely-veiled threat, instructing the Superintendent to make “a list of positions in which a change in personnel would be beneficial to our kids” and “help the union see the wisdom in cooperation rather than conflict.”

The article is lengthy, and much of what the new board has done is genuinely appalling. Case in point: the Board’s adoption of the American Birthright social studies curriculum referenced above, without any prior consultation with social studies teachers.

American Birthright materials emphasize patriotism, argue that the federal government should have no authority over public schools and say teachers should not encourage civic engagement, such as registering to vote or petitioning local lawmakers on issues students care about.

The curriculum was based on input from dozens of right-wing groups and activists, including the Claremont Institute, the Family Research Council and Moms for Liberty. Proponents defend it as a “bipartisan” alternative to coursework described as “hijacked by liberal concepts.” It’s heavily biased toward the right (for example, it includes Bill Clinton’s impeachment but not Donald Trump’s.)

The Colorado State Board of Education rejected American Birthright in October. The National Council for the Social Studies, a professional trade group for educators, issued a rare warning against using it.

You really need to read the whole thing.

If America hasn’t hit “bottom” I don’t know what bottom would look like…..

Comments

The Kids Are All Right

April 8, 2023

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Aside from the conclusions of ChatGPT, shared yesterday, is there any evidence of increased civic engagement by today’s young people?

Quite a bit, as it turns out.

Chicago’s Mayoral election saw a 24% increase in turnout by young voters.I wasn’t able to locate youth turnout for the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, but  increased youth turnout was critical to the earlier re-election of Democratic Governor Tony Evers.

A recent article from the New York Times detailed Republican efforts in several states to suppress college student voting, noting that–while there was still room for improvement–“college students, who had long paid little attention to elections, emerged as a crucial voting bloc in the 2018 midterms.” (According to some reports, the youth vote breaks 3-1 for Democrats.)

It isn’t just voting. Signs point to an increase in overall civic engagement by America’s young citizens.

Here in Indiana, the legislature passed a Hoosier version of Florida’s “Don’t say gay” bill, and triggered an unprecedented protest by schoolchildren.

Around 100 students from the Center For Inquiry School 27 held a walk-out Monday afternoon to protest Indiana’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill which would restrict how teachers are able to discuss sexual orientation or gender identity in the classroom.  

The students marched, chanted and held signs with slogans like “we’re here and we’re queer” for a little under an hour at the Martin Luther King Jr. Park on the near north side of Indianapolis.

The student-led walkout was organized by three fifth-grade students who said they wanted to take action after hearing how House Bill 1608 could impact their school.

“So we just started talking to everyone in the school to see if they wanted to do something about this,” Violet Brooks, one of the fifth graders who organized the march, told IndyStar.

Brooks said she thought maybe 50 people would join Monday’s march but roughly double that number of students from third to seventh grade came out. CFI 27 is a K-8 school in the Indianapolis Public Schools district.

Two other fifth-grade organizers, Norah May and Paper Hahn, walked around the park with pride flags around their shoulders and rainbows painted on their cheeks. At one point they mounted the nearby jungle gym to start chants of “kill the bill.”

It isn’t just children in Indiana. After the Nashville shooting, students in Tennessee erupted.

One week after six people were killed in a mass shooting at The Covenant School, hundreds of high school students across Nashville walked out of their classrooms on Monday morning, joining parents and supporters to rally and demand gun reform…

From the Capitol to Martin Luther King Jr. Magnet and Hume-Fogg Academic Magnet high schools, students walked out in protest or held classroom “walk-ins” where they expressed sorrow, disbelief and anger with educators. 

Outside the Capitol, hundreds gathered in misting rain, chanting as they demanded state lawmakers to enact gun reform.

Subsequently, media outlets have covered similar, widespread protests by schoolchildren across the country.

State politics are even factoring into high school graduates’ college choices. 

A national survey of the impact of state social policies on college choices found that “a substantial fraction of high school seniors bound for four-year colleges as full-time students reported passing over a school they had initially considered based exclusively on state-level political considerations.”

That doesn’t bode well for universities in Indiana, which depend significantly on tuition dollars generated by enrollment, or for a state already struggling to attract and retain educated workers.

Of course, young people’s avenues to engagement are no longer restricted to voting and/or taking to the streets. As one study from CitizenLab noted,

For the under 30s, citizen engagement is showing up in new ways: their engagement is primarily done online, through social media or civic tech platforms. These tools give young citizens a greater voice in their community and help them express their concerns and priorities and build a long-term bond with government….

Today, the average age of a child receiving their first smartphone is around 10 years old. The upcoming generation will expect to see fast and responsive government processes, and they will probably be unlikely to attend a Monday night council meeting. Using digital participation platforms at the local level is an excellent tactic to engage younger citizens, as they are familiar with technology and would easily understand online platforms. 45 percent of the participants that utilize CitizenLab’s platform are under the age of 35. The recent rise in political participation in citizens ages 16-24 in both the United States and the United Kingdom shows that young voters are eager to engage, and should therefore be given appropriate means to do so. (emphasis mine)

Not every teenager looking at a screen is accessing Tik-Tok.

Young Americans are a lot more civically focused than most of my generation was at their ages. They may save us yet.

Comments

I Know I’m A Broken Record…

July 11, 2022

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Can you stand one more diatribe about the importance of civic literacy? Especially now, as Congressional hearings and Supreme Court decisions demonstrate not just how close we’ve come to disaster?

An enormous amount of research confirms that far too many Americans lack even the most basic knowledge needed to make informed public judgments. Productive civic engagement simply cannot occur absent an accurate understanding of both American history and the “rules of the game”– especially but not exclusively the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the documents that frame and constrain policy choices in America.

The American Constitution was a product of the Enlightenment, the 18th Century philosophical movement that gave us science, empirical inquiry, and the “natural rights” and “social contract” theories of government. Too few Americans are familiar with the Enlightenment—and even fewer recognize that it changed the definition of individual liberty.  The Puritans who settled the New World had seen liberty as “freedom to do the right thing”—freedom to worship and obey the right God in the true church, and their right to use the power of government to make sure their neighbors did the same. (Sort of like the current majority on the Supreme Court.) It’s a perspective embraced by today’s Puritans, like Ron DeSantis.

The Enlightenment ushered in the belief that we humans are entitled to a significant degree of individual autonomy just because we’re human– and that government has an obligation to respect those inborn, inalienable rights. Accordingly, the Bill of Rights was written to protect us from overzealous government. The Bill of Rights is essentially a list of things that government is forbidden to do– dictate our religious or political beliefs, search us without probable cause, or censor our expression, for example—and it can’t do those things even when popular majorities approve.

Of particular relevance today is the fact that the U.S. Constitution as amended and construed over the years guarantees all citizens an equal right to participate in democratic governance– and to have our preferences count at the ballot box. Those guarantees are meaningless without sustained civic engagement by an informed, civically-literate citizenry.

Let me say that a different way: Protection of our constitutional rights ultimately depends upon the existence of a civically-literate electorate.

America’s political culture is the most toxic it has been in my lifetime– and I’m old. There are lots of theories about how we got here—from partisan gerrymandering and residential sorting to increasing tribalism to fear generated by rapid social and technological change and exacerbated by dishonest partisan media. But our current inability to engage in productive civic conversation is also an outgrowth of declining trust in our social and political institutions—primarily government. Restoring that trust is critically important —but in order to trust government, we have to understand what it is and isn’t supposed to do.

We have to understand how the people we elect are supposed to behave in order to recognize deviations from that standard.

Bottom line: an accurate, basic, common understanding of America’s history and philosophy is absolutely critical to our continued ability to talk to each other, build community and function as Americans, rather than as members of rival tribes competing for power and advantage. Unfortunately, basic civic knowledge is in very short supply, as even a cursory glance at FaceBook or Twitter will demonstrate.

The great debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were about the proper role of government. We’re still having that debate. The overarching issue is where to strike the balance between government power and individual liberty. The issue, in other words, is: who decides? Who decides what book you read, what prayer you say, who you marry, whether you procreate, how you use your property? Who decides when the state may justifiably deprive you of liberty—or tell you to wear a mask?

In our Constitutional system, individuals have the right to make their own political and moral decisions, even when lots of other people believe those decisions are wrong. What they don’t have is the right to harm or endanger others, or the right to deny an equal liberty to people with whom they disagree. Drawing those lines can be difficult; it’s impossible when significant numbers of citizens don’t understand the most basic commitments of our constituent documents.

When people don’t understand when government can properly impose rules and when it can’t– when they don’t understand the most basic premises of our legal system– our public discourse is impoverished and ultimately unproductive.

That’s where we are today.

Widespread civic ignorance has allowed dishonest partisans to rewrite history, pervert our basic institutions, and ignore the rule of law– not only undermining the Constitution but eroding the trust essential to the maintenance of democratic institutions.

To quote a former President, we are in “deep doodoo.”

Comments

Get Off The Couch

February 16, 2022

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Today, I’m speaking to a group of women students at IUPUI. I was asked to address civic engagement. These are the remarks I plan to share….(longer than usual–sorry about that.)

___________________________–

In the blurb I sent as an introduction to this talk, I wrote that “America is in the throes of a not-so-cold Civil War. Political participation and activism have never been more important—but what do those terms mean? What is required of women who want to secure the progress that has been made, not just for women but for the diverse citizens who make up our “body politic”? What is our obligation as citizens to return the political process and government to something resembling sanity?”

Let me deconstruct that paragraph, and explain what I meant by each of those assertions.

When I say we are in the midst of a “civil war,” isn’t such an assertion hyperbole, a wild exaggeration? Actually, I don’t think so. The American Civil War was fought to defend the institution of slavery, an institution that rested upon a belief that Black people were inherently inferior. The slave owners and their White apologists may have been defeated, but their very pernicious bigotry still motivates far too many Americans.

Today, a resurgent White Christian Nationalism is driving a wide variety of destructive behaviors and encouraging the increased expression of racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia and misogyny. You can see it in the ridiculous argument that teaching accurate history is Critical Race Theory—a subject these folks couldn’t define if their lives depended on it—and can’t be allowed. We see it in efforts to bans books and in fights over what can be taught—or even discussed—in our public schools.

The progress that has permitted Blacks, women, and other minorities to advance—to take more visible seats at the civic table—has been met with grievance and hysterical resistance. The election of a Black President was a catalyst for more overt expressions of deep-seated bigotry. A significant number of White Christians tell pollsters that only White Christians can be “real Americans” and that the rest of us are here on sufferance. The people marching and chanting about being “replaced” are telegraphing their fear of losing social dominance.

Although it’s true that only a few people are actually shooting at each other—I think it is not inaccurate to say that we are engaged in a civil war over very different visions of what it means to be an American.

We women have a critical stake in this fight. Patriarchy is part and parcel of what is really an effort to resist modernity and social change, and the assault on reproductive rights is best understood as an attack on women’s equality and autonomy. You need not be “pro- abortion” to understand why the decision to carry a fetus to term must be made by the individual woman, not by the government. (As a lawyer and former ACLU director, I can tell you that the constitutional issue is not whether a woman can legally abort: the issue is who has the right to make that decision—the individual or the state?

The current use of “my body, my choice” by anti-vaxxers who are anti-choice would be humorous if it wasn’t evidence of incredible civic ignorance. In fact, the anti-vaxxers have it exactly backward: Government has an affirmative obligation to protect public health and safety—to prevent some citizens from harming others. Courts have long held that public health restrictions are legitimate and appropriate. A pregnant woman, however, poses no threat to her neighbors.)

Whether a woman calls herself pro-choice or pro-life, she needs to understand that a government that can control her body considers her a second-class citizen. Once women lose the right to make their own reproductive decisions, they open the door to loss of other hard-won rights.

America is really at an inflection point. We are experiencing an extreme relapse into tribalism, and at the same time, a number of longstanding government structures are showing their age or are otherwise under assault. The Electoral College and the filibuster have outlived any utility they may once have had; the Supreme Court has been turned into a political rather than a judicial body; gerrymandering has allowed both parties to carve out districts perceived as so safe for one party or the other that people stay home because they figure their vote doesn’t count. There is so much about our current government—not to mention our politics—that cries out for repair.

Speaking of repair–you all have a choice. You can tune in to Dancing with the Stars or the Kardashians while the planet warms, racism thrives, and American government is gridlocked and impotent. If enough of you do that, my advice would be not to reproduce, since the world your children will inhabit is likely to be a chaotic hellscape. Or you can get off the couch and engage—become an activist, and work to make things better for your children and my grandchildren.

What would that look like?

Well, you don’t have to run for office or even work on a campaign, although that would be great. There are  plenty of other ways to be civically active.

One thing you can do that would make an enormous difference is helping to get out the vote. You know those gerrymandered districts I talked about? The data used to draw district lines is turnout from the preceding election. But previous turnout has been depressed by the widespread belief that the game was fixed, so that casting a dissenting vote wouldn’t make a difference. I’m here to tell you that a number of supposedly safe districts wouldn’t be safe if turnout substantially increased.

You can also work on the campaign of someone you believe is honorable, someone whose positions include fixing these systemic problems and working for a fairer, more open and inclusive society. Or you can do general “grunt work” for the political party of your choice.

But even if you absolutely hate politics, you aren’t off the hook. In the introductory blurb, I referred to citizens’ obligations—and one of those obligations is civic engagement, making a reasonable effort to improve your community. There are lots of avenues available to channel that effort: You can volunteer for a nonprofit organization that is addressing a problem that matters to you. You can tutor kids from a poor neighborhood. You can read up on American history and the values actually embedded in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and explain what you’ve learned to people who display a lack of civic literacy. You can speak up—nicely but firmly– when you hear someone share a bigoted statement.

We are at a pivotal point in America’s trajectory. We will either surrender to the mob that wants to take the country “back”—who want to ensure that women and Jews and Muslims and people of color continue to be second class citizens—or we will come together to breathe new life into the Declaration’s vision of a country where all people have been created equal.

My generation has really made a mess of things. Yours, unfortunately, has been handed the job of fixing it. If those of you on this Zoom call are anything like the students I taught, though, you’re up to the task.

Comments

Accepting The Challenge

July 3, 2021

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

A few days ago, Lester, a frequent commenter on this blog, reiterated his concern that those “blowing off steam” online–here and elsewhere–are substituting commentary for tangible action. In a private comment, I challenged him on that assumption, pointing out that he had no way of knowing what activities various commenters might–or might not– be engaged in.

I am aware of no data that either supports or rebuts Lester’s evident belief that people who regularly participate in online discussions (or diatribes) do so in lieu of other efforts to address America’s current dysfunctions. In fact, if I were to hazard a guess, I would expect that people who clearly care deeply about the political and social issues so often discussed here would be more likely than others to be involved in civic efforts to ameliorate those problems.

In response to my challenge, I got one in return: “ask your readers what they are doing to save American democracy.”

Fair enough. So today, I am asking regular readers (including you “lurkers” who rarely or never comment) to prove me right! What are you doing to improve your communities, to engage and mobilize rational people, or to educate your fellow-citizens about the nature of the challenges we are facing?

My sense is that there is much more civic and political activity “out there” today than most of us recognize, and that includes not just the incredibly important traditional efforts to support good candidates, register people and get out the vote, but also multiple endeavors that aim to change the culture–to make our neighborhoods, cities and states more inclusive, more equal and more humane, and to raise awareness of the truly existential threats we face–threats not just political but also environmental.

So–here’s my request to all of you. Post a comment and tell me (1) what political and social problem you consider most threatening; and (2) what you are doing to help solve that problem, other than complaining about it.

Make my day!

Comments

Posts pagination

1 2 3 Older posts
Articles, editorials, papers and excerpts from books written by Sheila Kennedy.

Subscribe


 

Categories

  • Academic Papers
  • Constitution
  • Criminal Justice
  • Education / Youth
  • Free Speech
  • Gay Rights
  • Local Government
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Public Policy and Governance
  • Racial Equality
  • Random Blogging
  • Religious Liberty
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Blogroll

  • American Constitution Society blog
  • Breaking Barriers
  • Civil Discourse Now
  • Daily Kos
  • Masson's Blog
  • Mike Leppert
  • Ogden on Politics
  • Slate
  • Talking Points Memo
  • The World's Most Dangerous Beauty Salon, Inc.
Sheila Kennedy, Privacy Policy