Apples and Trees

They say the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

In the wake of Judge Rosenberg’s ruling that Charlie White was ineligible when he ran for Secretary of State, his father posted a series of highly inflammatory, anti-Semitic rants on his Facebook page. Subsequently, he must have realized how damaging they were, and took them down.

Lesson One: in cyberspace, nothing is ever erased. (Just ask George Allen, he of the “Macaca moment.”)

Lesson Two: when people are angry, all too often their real nature emerges. In this case, it isn’t pretty.

Lesson Three: when you are really puzzled by an individual’s seemingly bizarre behavior, sometimes looking at nature and nurture will supply a hint.

I received a call from a reporter with the Indianapolis Star, inquiring about this sordid little rant. One of her questions was “As a former ACLU Executive Director, do you think he had the right to post such things?” The answer, of course, is an unequivocal yes. People have the right to be bigots and to utter hateful nonsense. And the rest of us have the right to criticize and judge them for it.

I’ve tried to copy the screenshot, below, so you can judge for yourselves.

Update: the Star is reporting Darrell White’s claim that his account was hacked. As ‘proof,’ he says he reported the matter to the local sheriff–a somewhat bizarre thing to do when no identity theft is involved. The Star quoted Mike Delph as saying he’d never known the Whites to be hateful. (Yes, that┬áMike Delph…) At this point, people can choose to believe he was the innocent victim of a Facebook hacking, or that he was the author of what certainly seem to be heartfelt, if revolting, posts.


  1. Wow… Not a typical Charlie Sheen “Winning!” moment. Wonder if White will do the right thing and save the embarrassment that will come if a court order is required to vacate him?

  2. If I were Carl Brizzi, I would certainly advise an attempt to insert some “doubt” into exactly “who” created such a posting. But, wIthout proof, “I was hacked” seems to be a fairly lame defense.

    Unless, perhaps, Secy. White’s Dad’s password competency equates to something like “12345” or “password”. But then, we’re back to “the fruit not falling far from the tree”, aren’t we?

Comments are closed.